The Centre For Youth Impact
  • About
    • What we do
    • Why we exist
    • Who we are >
      • Our Team
      • Our Trustees
      • Our Networks
    • Newsletter
  • Our Work
    • Networks and Practice Development
    • Research & Learning >
      • Youth Investment Fund Learning Project
      • YPQI UK Pilot
      • The Listening Fund Evaluation
    • Funders and Commissioners >
      • #iWill Learning Hub
      • #iWill Act for Change Fund
      • Enterprise Development Programme
      • Commissioning for Youth Employment
  • Our Networks
    • Regional
    • Get Involved
  • News & Events
  • Blogs
  • Resource Hub
    • Reading and Learning
    • Impact Measurement for Beginners
    • Outcomes
    • Quality and Fidelity
    • Need and Demand
    • Attributing Change
    • Theories of Change
    • Feedback
    • Costs and Benefits
    • Evaluation

What do we need to measure? The case for subjectivity and disaggregation

27/7/2017

0 Comments

 
Nesta’s Geoff Mulgan suggests two directions for statistics that could help increase productive public engagement with data. He argues that to bring humanity back into policy and politics, more emphasis should be placed on subjective measures. He also highlights disaggregated data can allow for a better understanding of interesting patterns and detail.
​
Read the full article
Picture
About the author
Geoff Mulgan is Chief Executive of Nesta. Under his leadership Nesta has launched a range of new initiatives in investment, programmes and research and has implemented a new strategy involving partnerships with foundations, governments and companies in the UK and internationally.

How could this improve services for young people?
Data which is detailed and subjective has an emotional impact which can help humanise research, supporting researchers to tell more compelling stories about their findings to wider audiences.
​
Further reading
The best impact approach recognises when to use it, and when not to, by David Hounsell
0 Comments

What are randomised controlled trials?

26/7/2017

0 Comments

 
Nesta’s James Phipps and Teo Firpo explain how randomised controlled trials can be used to capture the impact of an intervention.

Read the full article
​
Picture
Who is this for?
This article is part of the new experimentation toolkit developed by Innovation Growth Lab to help policymakers in innovation and entrepreneurship test new ideas. It's a good explainer for those who are new to RCTs.

How could this improve services for young people?
Randomised controlled trials are considered to be the most rigorous way of establishing if evidence resulting from an experiment shows that the outcomes have been caused by the programme or intervention.
​
Further reading
Doing randomised controlled trials in the real world
0 Comments

The Generalizability Puzzle

25/7/2017

0 Comments

 
In this article in Stanford Social Innovation Review, Mary Ann Bates and Rachel Glennerster from the Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab argue that rigorous impact evaluations can tell us a lot about the world, not just the particular contexts in which they are conducted. They explore how detailed knowledge of local institutions can be complimentary to the global knowledge of common behavioural relationships, improving our potential to find effective answers.

Read the full article
Picture
About the authors
Mary Ann Bates is deputy director of the Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab (J-PAL), North America. Rachel Glennerster is executive director of the Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab (J-PAL).

How could this improve services for young people?
The article explores the challenges and opportunties in replicating successful services or programmes using evidence. It supports better decision-making in the application of evidence and learning to new situations and contexts.
​
Futher reading
People and place: How local delivery context can affect replication, by Frances Flaxington
0 Comments

A Whole New World — Funding and Commissioning in Complexity

21/7/2017

0 Comments

 
In this report, Collaborate CIC present findings of research exploring the different ways funders are tackling the complexity of real world issues affecting public services and charitable trusts. The report highlights the problems which can occur when charitable funders and public service commissioners attempt to use a simplified ‘target-based’ model.

Read the report
Picture
How could this help/improve services for young people?
The report questions traditional assumptions about measurement, impact, and relationships, and identifies organisational cultures and practices that support more grounded, effective, and equitable approaches to working in complex systems.
​
Further reading
Commissioning possible
0 Comments

Big data is bad data

20/7/2017

0 Comments

 
On his Learning Spy blog, David Didau explores the limitations of big data in making meaningful decisions for improving the work of schools. He argues that collecting big data creates the illusion that schools can predict and control outcomes, but no amount of data can accurately describe the complexity of human systems.

Read the full article
​
Picture
Photo credit: Social Traders

About the author
David Didau works at Swindon Academy as well as being a freelance writer, speaker, trainer and author. He runs the blog The Learning Spy since 2011.
​
Further reading
Six big schools’ challenges facing EEF – and how it is responding, by Stephen Tall
0 Comments
<<Previous

    Newsletter

    ​Our monthly newsletter collects news, events, research and blogs from the Centre, our networks and practitioners and organisations around the world. Sign-up here

    Archives

    August 2017
    July 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016

    Categories

    All

Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Unit 2, 290 Mare Street, E8 1HE | Tel: 02070332649 
 Email:  hello@youthimpact.uk

The Centre for Youth Impact is a company limited by guarantee (No.10640742) and a registered charity in England and Wales (No. 1178148)
Copyright © 2018 The Centre for Youth Impact. 
Subscribe to our newsletter
Picture
  • About
    • What we do
    • Why we exist
    • Who we are >
      • Our Team
      • Our Trustees
      • Our Networks
    • Newsletter
  • Our Work
    • Networks and Practice Development
    • Research & Learning >
      • Youth Investment Fund Learning Project
      • YPQI UK Pilot
      • The Listening Fund Evaluation
    • Funders and Commissioners >
      • #iWill Learning Hub
      • #iWill Act for Change Fund
      • Enterprise Development Programme
      • Commissioning for Youth Employment
  • Our Networks
    • Regional
    • Get Involved
  • News & Events
  • Blogs
  • Resource Hub
    • Reading and Learning
    • Impact Measurement for Beginners
    • Outcomes
    • Quality and Fidelity
    • Need and Demand
    • Attributing Change
    • Theories of Change
    • Feedback
    • Costs and Benefits
    • Evaluation